In an age where transparency is both demanded and distrusted, where oversight is often decentralized and regulatory data obscured behind jurisdictional borders, one platform has quietly begun mapping one of the most opaque areas of modern professional operations: crew disqualification.
The site is called Crew Disquantified Org, and while its name might sound bureaucratic, its mission is anything but: to document, contextualize, and clarify when, why, and how licensed crew members—from commercial pilots to maritime captains, train operators to space-bound engineers—are disqualified from duty, either temporarily or permanently.
But this isn’t just a blacklist. Crew Disquantified Org functions as a digital archive, analytical tool, and educational resource, offering journalists, regulators, employers, and even the general public a deeper understanding of how disqualification systems work, where they fail, and what they mean for broader operational safety.
In an increasingly automated but still human-reliant infrastructure world, the stakes couldn’t be higher.
The Rise of Crew Disqualification as a Public Concern
Whether it’s the aviation sector, the maritime industry, or space missions in the 2030s, global systems depend on high-performance human crews working in high-risk, high-regulation environments. The standards for training and certification are stringent. But so too are the risks.
And when things go wrong—when a pilot is grounded for substance use, or a train conductor makes a fatal misjudgment, or a cargo ship captain disables navigation protocols—the consequences can be catastrophic. That’s where crew disqualification comes in: a regulatory tool designed not only to penalize misconduct or unfitness, but to protect systems and the public.
Yet until recently, data on disqualifications has been difficult to find, scattered across internal government logs, union arbitration files, and fragmented corporate compliance reports. There was no global, searchable, public-facing repository.
What Is Crew Disquantified Org?
Launched in 2022 by a small coalition of former FAA auditors, European transport investigators, and compliance data scientists, Crew Disquantified Org is a non-profit open data platform that consolidates disqualification records from public and verified private sources.
Its database spans over a dozen countries and includes thousands of cases of crew members being disqualified, decertified, or suspended due to medical, ethical, legal, or professional grounds.
But the site does more than list names. It provides:
- Contextual narratives explaining regulatory findings
- Statistical visualizations showing trends across industries
- Policy comparisons between regulatory bodies
- Anonymized case studies for training and research purposes
The goal? Not shame—but systemic clarity.
Why Disqualification Data Matters
To the public, the term “crew disqualification” may seem abstract—something buried in technical manuals. But behind each disqualification is a systemic signal: a lapse in screening, a crack in training, a human under pressure in a high-stakes role.
Understanding these incidents helps answer vital questions:
- Are certain sectors more vulnerable to crew burnout?
- How often is substance use a factor in aviation errors?
- What role do mental health evaluations play in recurring maritime incidents?
- Are regulatory thresholds consistent across nations?
These are questions that governments have long tried to answer privately. But Crew Disquantified Org argues that public understanding enhances—not undermines—system safety.
“This isn’t about naming and shaming,” says co-founder and chief analyst Jasper Thorne, a former ICAO safety investigator. “It’s about learning from near-misses before they become disasters.”
Inside the Platform: How It Works
1. Verified Data Collection
Crew Disquantified Org gathers information from publicly available documents (e.g., civil aviation authority rulings, court records), whistleblower reports (vetted and anonymized), and direct partnerships with international regulators.
All entries are fact-checked and timestamped, with source citations provided. The platform adheres to GDPR and equivalent privacy protections, redacting sensitive personal information unless cases are already a matter of public record.
2. Taxonomy of Disqualification
Cases are categorized using a standardized framework:
- Medical Disqualification – Mental health, cardiovascular, or neurological grounds
- Ethical/Legal Disqualification – Fraud, falsification of logs, criminal convictions
- Operational Disqualification – Repeated violations, negligence, technical incompetence
- Administrative Disqualification – Lapsed certifications, non-compliance with mandatory training
Each case is assigned a risk index score, indicating the degree of systemic threat it may have posed based on outcome, role, and sector.
3. Analytical Tools
Registered users (journalists, researchers, regulators) can access visualization dashboards showing:
- Sector-by-sector disqualification rates
- Year-over-year trends
- Incident clustering by geography or regulation
- Correlations between disqualification type and operator size
These tools are helping to shift safety conversations from reactive blame to proactive reform.
Key Sectors in Focus
A. Aviation
With over 30,000 licensed pilots across Europe and North America, aviation is both one of the most regulated and most scrutinized sectors. Crew Disquantified Org has already logged 2,300 pilot disqualifications since 2018, including:
- A regional jet co-pilot disqualified for repeated altitude errors linked to untreated sleep apnea
- A senior captain grounded for failing a mandatory simulator test three times in a row
- A commercial pilot suspended after an altercation with ground staff revealed ongoing behavioral instability
These cases are not published as sensational headlines but as case studies—often used in flight schools to spark policy discussions.
B. Maritime Shipping
Long voyages, variable international standards, and isolated working conditions make maritime disqualification cases particularly complex. Crew Disquantified Org highlights cases such as:
- Tanker captains disqualified after drug possession arrests in port
- Navigation officers found repeatedly disabling tracking systems to cut corners on route times
- Engineers suspended for falsifying maintenance logs under corporate pressure
The site advocates for international harmonization of disqualification standards, as penalties vary widely between countries.
C. Rail & Urban Transit
While less frequently discussed, transit disqualification has serious implications for urban safety. The platform has catalogued hundreds of cases of:
- Operators violating fatigue management rules
- Unreported medication use impairing judgment
- Fraudulent licensing in subcontractor-led systems
By shedding light on these cases, Crew Disquantified Org helps public transportation agencies benchmark and reform.
A Case for Transparency Over Secrecy
One of the platform’s more controversial positions is its argument against the secrecy clauses often embedded in union arbitration or civil settlements involving disqualified personnel.
While respecting individual privacy, the platform pushes for anonymized reporting and root-cause transparency, arguing that concealment impedes collective learning.
In one high-profile example, a freight train derailment in Eastern Europe was linked to an engineer previously disqualified in another country—yet due to privacy shielding, the new employer had no access to that record.
Such incidents underscore the importance of a borderless reporting framework, something Crew Disquantified Org aims to build incrementally, through global partnerships.
Education and Policy Impact
The platform’s reach extends beyond investigation. It offers:
- Training modules for compliance officers
- Simulation tools for regulators to test policy changes
- Public guides explaining disqualification systems in accessible language
In 2024, the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) cited Crew Disquantified Org data in a landmark report recommending updates to pilot re-certification processes.
That same year, the U.S. Department of Transportation invited the platform to participate in a task force on cross-modal crew safety harmonization.
“We’re not anti-labor or anti-management,” says Thorne. “We’re anti-opaqueness. We believe shared knowledge saves lives.”
Critics and Controversies
Of course, not everyone agrees with the platform’s approach.
1. Privacy Advocates
Some argue that even anonymized case logs can unfairly stigmatize individuals, especially in industries with small workforces.
2. Labor Unions
Several transportation unions have accused Crew Disquantified Org of undermining due process by publishing disqualification summaries before full appeals are exhausted.
The platform has responded by implementing a “contested status” label, indicating cases under active appeal or dispute.
3. National Regulators
Some regulators—especially in jurisdictions with looser oversight norms—have declined to share data, citing sovereignty and national security.
In response, the platform has prioritized building a coalition of progressive partners rather than universal access.
The Future of Crew Disquantified Org
Looking forward, the platform aims to expand into new areas:
A. Spaceflight and Aerospace
With the rise of commercial space missions, the need for astronaut-equivalent crew qualification is critical. The platform is developing a new taxonomy specific to space-bound crew performance and ethics.
B. AI-Assisted Disqualification Screening
Partnering with ethics labs, Crew Disquantified Org is testing AI tools that could flag potential disqualification risks before incidents occur—based on log anomalies, fatigue data, and simulation results.
C. Crowdsourced Incident Mapping
In development is a secure, anonymous submission system for crew members to log near-misses or unreported disqualification risks, fostering a culture of self-monitoring and peer accountability.
Conclusion: Accountability Is the Foundation of Trust
In a world increasingly governed by automation, real-time data, and machine learning, the most fragile—and essential—link in any complex system remains the human operator.
Crew Disquantified Org doesn’t pretend to have all the answers. But by opening up one of the most hidden corners of professional regulation, it offers the possibility of a new compact: one where accountability leads to reform, and where the safety of the public is built not just on certification—but on clarity, courage, and a shared understanding of what happens when things go wrong.
For more information, click here.
